Which of the following is a potential consequence of bail jumping?

In the context of bail jumping, which occurs when a defendant fails to appear in court as required after being released on bail, the potential consequence of an increased bail amount for future cases is significant. When a defendant jumps bail, the court may view them as a flight risk. As a result, if they are arrested again and seek bail for a subsequent charge, the judge may set a higher bail amount to ensure that the defendant appears in court. This increase is a reflection of the court's effort to mitigate the risk of the defendant failing to comply with future court mandates.

The other options presented do not align with the realities of the legal system following bail jumping. Automatic release from incarceration is contrary to the consequences of failing to appear, which often leads to further arrest and legal complications. Similarly, a guaranteed bail refund does not apply since jumping bail typically results in losing the original bail amount, as the court may forfeit the bail due to the missed appearance. Moreover, an immediate trial date is unlikely since jumping bail can lead to additional legal proceedings before any trial can be scheduled, focusing on the bail jumping charge itself. Thus, the correct choice reflects the legal repercussions that defendants face in these situations.